Actualités

Partager sur :

Bilans AVC_Fugl-meyer Assessment of Motor performance

30 mai 2017 Association
Publié par Stephan ROSTAGNO
Vue 7850 fois

Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery

Fugl-Meyer et al. 1975

 

     Initialement, le FMA était composé de 5 sous-domaines (fonction motrice, sensations, amplitudes articulaires, douleurs articulaires, équilibre). Aujourd'hui seule la section de l'évaluation de la fonction motrice est recommandée.   
Le FMA moteur permet d'évaluer les déficits de la commande motrice et de la régulation des mouvements volontaires. Il est considéré comme le test de référence pour l'évaluation de la fonction motrice au niveau international. Il se compose de deux sous- échelles (FMA-UE et FMA-LE) qui peuvent être utilisées séparement. Il se base sur les stades de récupération de Brunstroom et Twitchell.
 
 
 

Fiche pdf à remplir     Fiche excell à remplir     Protocole

 

Mode d'évaluation Domaine de la CIF Sous-domaine
 Basé sur la performance  Fonction physiologique  Fonction motrice
Objectif de l'outil de mesure Temps de réalisation Formation de l'évaluateur

 Prédire la récupération          Evaluer les changements

30 minutes   Lecture du manuel

 

Interprétation des résultats
Validité prédictive

 Réalisé en phase aigüe, il permet de prédire le niveau fonctionnel du patient à 6 mois:

<31pts

32 à 47pts

48pts à 52pts

>53pts

Validité Discriminative
 NT
Différence Minimale Détectable

Phase sub-aigüe

 9pts pour le membre supérieur

Phase chronique

entre 4.25 et 7.25pts pour le membre sup

6pts pour le membre inférieur

Différence Minimale Cliniquement Importante

Phase chronique:

 6pts pour le membre inférieur (Pandian et al.2016)

 NT=Non Testé (pas d'étude recensée à ce jour)

 

Propriétés métrologiques     Recommandations Academy of Neurology of the APTA

 

Références:

Fugl-Meyer, A.R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehab Medicine,7(1),13–31.

Bernspang, B., Asplund, K., et al. (1987). "Motor and perceptual impairments in acute stroke patients: effects on self-care ability." Stroke 18: 1081-1086. Find it on PubMed

Crow, J. L. and Harmeling-van der Wel, B. C. (2008). "Hierarchical properties of the motor function sections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for people after stroke: a retrospective study." Phys Ther 88: 1554-1567. Find it on PubMed

Dettmann, M. A., Linder, M. T., et al. (1987). "Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient." Am J Phys Med 66: 77-90. Find it on PubMed

Duncan, P. W., Goldstein, L. B., et al. (1992). "Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements." Stroke 23(8): 1084-1089. Find it on PubMed

Duncan, P. W., Lai, S. M., et al. (2000). "Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials." Neuropharmacology 39(5): 835-841. Find it on PubMed

Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., et al. (1983). "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident." Phys Ther 63: 1606-1610. Find it on PubMed

Gladstone, D. J., Danells, C. J., et al. (2002). "The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties." Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16: 232-240. Find it on PubMed

Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., et al. (2009). "Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation." Stroke 40(4): 1386-1391. Find it on PubMed

Hsueh, I. P., Hsu, M. J., et al. (2008). "Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement." Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(6): 737-744. Find it on PubMed

Lin, J. H., Hsueh, I. P., et al. (2004). "Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients." Clin Rehabil 18(4): 391-397. Find it on PubMed

Malouin, F., Pichard, L., et al. (1994). "Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 1206-1212. Find it on PubMed

Mao, H.-F., Hsueh, I. P., et al. (2002). "Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients." Stroke 33: 1022-1027. Find it on PubMed

Nadeau, S., Arsenault, A. B., et al. (1999). "Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke." Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78: 123-130. Find it on PubMed

Page, S. J., Fulk, G. D., & Boyne, P. (2012). "Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity fugl-meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke." Physical Therapy 92(6): 791.Find it on PubMed

Page, S. J., Hade, E., & Persch, A. (2015). "Psychometrics of the wrist stability and hand mobility subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in moderately impaired stroke." Physical Therapy 95(1): 103-108. Find it on PubMed

Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., et al. (2005). "Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study." Clin Rehabil 19: 404-411. Find it on PubMed

Sanford, J., Moreland, J., et al. (1993). "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke." Phys Ther 73: 447-454. Find it on PubMed

Shelton, F. D., Volpe, B. T., et al. (2001). "Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke." Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15(3): 229-237. Find it on PubMed

Wagner, J. M., Rhodes, J. A., et al. (2008). "Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke." Phys Ther 88(5): 652-663. Find it on PubMed

Wood-Dauphinee, S. L., Williams, J. I., et al. (1990). "Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke." Stroke 21: 731-739. Find it on PubMed

Woodbury, M. L., Velozo, C. A., et al. (2008). "Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89: 1563-1569. Find it on PubMed

 

Dutil, E., Corriveau, H., & Arsenault, A., Prévost, R. (1989). Protocole d’évaluation de la fonction sensori-motrice : test de Fugl-Meyer. La librairie de l’Université de Montréal.

Kupper,D.,& Bürge, E. (2013). Evaluation de la fonction motrice du membre supérieur parétique à la suite d’un accident vasculaire cerebral. Bruxelles: Editions Solal,De Boeck. Supérieur

See J1, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. (2013). A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials..Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Oct;27(8):732-41




J'aime

Aucun commentaire

Vous devez être connecté pour laisser un commentaire. Connectez-vous.